Motoring fixed penalty notices
A “fixed penalty notice” is not a motoring term in Great Britain — councils, the Home Office and the Pensions Regulator all use it for other things. This page is about the MOTORING one, issued under the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988, and it opens by ruling out the others.
First, which one is yours
“Fixed penalty notice” means four different things in Great Britain
If you arrived here from a search, there is a good chance you want one of the other three. This is the fastest way to find out.
Four notices that share a name
- Motoring fixed penalty noticeThis pageIssued under the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 for a road traffic offence. It carries a fixed amount and, for an endorsable offence, a fixed number of penalty points. This page is about this one.
- Council or environmental fixed penalty noticeNot this pageLittering, fly-tipping, waste and similar. Issued by a local authority under its own statutory powers, with its own amounts and its own appeal route. Nothing on this page applies to it.
- Parking charge notice, or a council penalty charge noticeNot this pageParking. A council PCN is a civil enforcement matter; a private “parking charge notice” is a contractual claim by a landowner’s agent. Neither is a motoring FPN, neither carries penalty points, and neither is covered here.
- A regulator’s fixed penaltyNot this pageSeveral regulators use the same phrase for their own enforcement notices. If yours came from one of those, this site cannot help — the statute behind it is a different one entirely.
What it is
An out-of-court disposal, not a conviction
This is the fact everything else about a fixed penalty follows from, and it is the one most often stated wrongly.
The Act defines a fixed penalty notice as a notice offering the opportunity to discharge any liability to conviction of the offence by paying a fixed penalty. Read that once more slowly, because every practical consequence is in it. It is an offer. What it offers is the discharge of liability to conviction. And the way you accept is by paying. Nobody convicts you, no court sentences you, and nothing is decided about your guilt — the matter simply ends.
That is why several things people expect to happen do not. There is no sentence, so there is no victim surcharge. There is no means enquiry, so the amount does not move with what you earn. There is no incentive structure, so paying on day one costs exactly what paying on the last day costs. And because no conviction occurs, an endorsable fixed penalty puts points on your driving record without producing a criminal record — two different things that are constantly run together.
The alternative is not hidden from you. Declining a fixed penalty, in the way the notice describes, means the matter is dealt with by a court instead — which brings in the court tier, where the fine is a percentage of relevant weekly income rather than a flat figure, and where a court may do things a fixed penalty cannot.
- What paying it does
- Discharges liability for the offence. No conviction occurs, and proceedings may not then be brought (RTOA 1988 s.52(1)).
- How the amount is set
- By order, as a flat figure. It is NOT means-tested — that is the court tier, and the two are priced by entirely different logics.
- Who issues it
- A constable, or the notice is fixed to the vehicle. A conditional offer, which is a different instrument on a different clock, comes from the issuing authority instead.
Sourced — legislationRTOA 1988 Part III (ss.52, 55, 64, 71–73, 75, 78) · FPO 2000 (S.I. 2000/2792) Sch.1legislation.gov.ukSLD current text, fetched 2026-08-02
Before the notice
The notice of intended prosecution, and its deadline
The first clock in the whole process, the shortest, and the one that runs before anything is decided about you.
For a stated group of offences — speeding among them — a driver cannot be convicted unless one of three things happened: they were warned at the time that the question of prosecution would be considered, or a summons was served on them, or a notice of intended prosecution was served, within 14 days of the offence being committed. The clock runs from the offence itself, not from the notice, not from the reading and not from the day the paperwork was printed.
The Act then sets out exceptions to that requirement, and they are worth knowing because they are the reason “they missed the deadline” is so often not the answer people hope. The requirement does not apply where there was an accident at the time of the offence or immediately afterwards involving the vehicle. It does not apply where neither the driver’s nor the registered keeper’s name and address could, with reasonable diligence, have been found in time. And it does not apply where the accused’s own conduct contributed to the failure to serve it.
One more distinction matters here. This period governs whether the matter can be pursued at all. It is not the period you have to pay anything, and it is not the period in which a fixed penalty must be issued — those are separate clocks, further down this page.
Sourced — legislationRTOA 1988 ss.1, 2 · Sch.1legislation.gov.ukSLD current text, fetched 2026-08-02
Driver identity
The requirement to say who was driving
A separate requirement with its own period and its own offence, and one that carries more points than the speeding it usually arrives with.
Where the driver of a vehicle is alleged to be guilty of a relevant offence, the keeper — and any other person — can be required in writing to give information identifying the driver. The period to respond is 28 days from service of that written notice. It is an obligation in its own right, quite separate from whatever is alleged about the driving, and it does not wait for the rest of the process to resolve.
Failing to give the information is itself an offence, and it is the more serious of the two: the schedule gives it a higher points figure than speeding carries. There is a defence where the keeper shows that they did not know and could not with reasonable diligence have found out who was driving — a real defence, and a narrow one, and not the same thing as declining to answer.
Practically, this is the requirement people most often overlook while concentrating on the fine, and it is the one with the sharpest consequence for doing so. If a request arrived with your paperwork, deal with it first.
Sourced — legislationRTA 1988 s.172 · RTOA 1988 Sch.2 Pt.Ilegislation.gov.ukSLD current text, fetched 2026-08-02
The conditional offer
A second instrument, on a longer clock — and a different issuer in Scotland
Where no notice was handed over at the roadside or fixed to the vehicle, this is what arrives instead. It is not the same document and it does not run to the same deadline.
A fixed penalty notice proper is given to you at the time, or fixed to the vehicle. Where neither happened — which is the ordinary situation for a camera offence — the route is a conditional offer: an offer to discharge liability by paying the fixed penalty and surrendering the licence for endorsement, made after the event. The period is 28 days from the offer, which is longer than the 21 days printed on a fixed penalty notice, and the two are constantly and wrongly treated as one number.
Here the two jurisdictions genuinely diverge, and it is a divergence in who rather than in how long. In England and Wales a conditional offer comes from a constable or a vehicle examiner. In Scotland the procurator fiscal has that role, with the Act also providing routes through a constable or vehicle examiner. If you are looking at a Scottish offer and expecting a police letterhead, that is why it does not look like the English descriptions you have read.
These differ by jurisdiction — who may make a conditional offer
England & Wales
Scotland
RTOA 1988 s.75 · s.76(5)
Sourced — legislationRTOA 1988 ss.75, 76legislation.gov.ukSLD current text, fetched 2026-08-02
Deadlines
Four clocks, and they are not the same clock
Each starts from a different event. Merging the suspended enforcement period with the conditional-offer period is the single most common mistake made about these notices.
Your notice
3 August 2026
The four clocks
- 21 daysSuspended enforcement periodfrom the date of the notice · RTOA 1988 s.52(3)(a)24 August 2026
- 28 daysConditional offer periodfrom service of the conditional offer · RTOA 1988 s.75(7)(c)/(8A)(a)—
- 14 daysNotice of intended prosecutionfrom the commission of the offence · RTOA 1988 s.1—
- 28 daysResponse to a driver-identity requestfrom service of the written notice · RTA 1988 s.172—
If it is not paid
£150
The counterweight · 21 days
This is the suspended enforcement period under RTOA 1988 s.52(3)(a): while it runs, proceedings may not be brought, and paying within it bars them permanently. It is not a discount window.
There is no early-payment discount on a fixed penalty in Great Britain. The period on the notice is a suspended enforcement period — proceedings may not be brought while it runs — not a window in which the amount is lower.
Sourced — legislationRTOA 1988 ss.1, 52(3)(a), 55(3), 64(2), 72, 73, 75 · RTA 1988 s.172legislation.gov.ukSLD current text, fetched 2026-08-02
Paying
What paying does, and what not paying does
Two very different outcomes, and the statute is careful about the second in a way most descriptions of it are not.
Paying within the period on the notice ends the matter. Proceedings may not be brought for that offence, the liability is discharged, and no conviction occurs. For an endorsable offence the points are endorsed on the driving record as part of that — the notice and the endorsement travel together, and paying is not a way of avoiding them.
If the penalty is not paid, the statute provides that a sum equal to the fixed penalty plus one half of it — £150, where the penalty is £100 — may be registered for enforcement against the recipient as a fine. Once it is registered, it has effect as if it were a fine imposed by that court on conviction, and ordinary fine-enforcement machinery follows.
The permissive word is the Act’s own and is kept here rather than tightened into a threat: the statute says “may”, not “must”. And the same Act supplies the counterweight. Someone who was wrongly served — who never received the notice, or was not the person liable — may make a statutory declaration within 21 days of receiving notice of the registration, which voids the notice, the registration and the endorsement. That safeguard is short, and it is the reason a registration notice is not something to leave in a pile.
Sourced — legislationRTOA 1988 ss.55(3), 64(2), 71–73, 78legislation.gov.ukSLD current text, fetched 2026-08-02
What the law does not say
Three things a fixed penalty is not
Each of these is stated wrongly somewhere in this market, and each is a cited finding rather than an opinion.
What the law does not say
No victim surcharge
Sentencing Act 2020 s.42(1) · RTOA 1988 s.52(1)
What the law does not say
No early-payment discount
RTOA 1988 s.52(3)(a) · s.78
What the law does not say
Not means-tested
RTOA 1988 Part III
“May”, not “must”
RTOA 1988 s.55(3) / s.64(2)
Paying or challenging
Both go to whoever sent the notice
Not to us, and not to any general service. The force or court named on your own notice is the only body that can act on it.
The official service
Pay a fixed penalty notice
The police force or court named on your notice
The official route to pay, or to say you want the matter heard in court instead. Which body it is depends on your notice, which is why this links to the government’s own index rather than to one force.
This site never asks for a driving licence number, a National Insurance number, a notice reference or a date of birth, and it renders no lookup form. Use the service above.
Pay a fixed penalty noticeWhat this site does not do
Where this applies. This site answers for England and Wales and for Scotland. It does not answer for Northern Ireland: the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 does not extend there (s.99(7)), and Northern Ireland runs a separate Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order regime that is not among this site’s sources. Figures here are Great Britain figures, not UK-wide ones.